Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Louis Pilfold
1327c1ba54 Ruby: Remove some duplication 2015-05-05 16:57:16 +01:00
Louis Pilfold
b988fb9576 Ruby: Remove some duplication 2014-11-27 14:27:01 +00:00
Louis Pilfold
2796cf66de Ruby: Remove 2 snippets that save a negative number of keypresses 2014-11-27 14:06:46 +00:00
Louis Pilfold
1d9afe253b Ruby: Remove lots of placeholder text 2014-11-27 14:01:00 +00:00
Louis Pilfold
c46251515f Ruby: Remove excessive whitespace 2014-11-27 14:01:00 +00:00
Louis Pilfold
b7fb63cd15 Ruby: def with params to fill style guide 2014-11-27 14:01:00 +00:00
Holger Rapp
59dcc2b72d Brings current UltiSnips snippets into the repository. 2014-03-04 09:17:27 +01:00
Marc Weber
8024cfcecd while -> wh, see #230 and README.md 2013-08-08 11:24:27 +02:00
Marc Weber
c0cddc9f86 ruby: count from 1, not 0 (I think its very important to think about the name)
add static_var snippet
2013-08-08 09:28:08 +02:00
Marc Weber
533fe487a1 ruby snippets:
use do dov for both engines
drop #TODO comments

changing defaults is bad, but I expect ruby folks to expect do to type
do ..

doo has the advantage to get a completion popup .. but its too long to
type

The UtiSnips do snippet didn't make sense: the nested placeholder still
didn't remove the space after the "do" when deleting it - so it was
written badly. Could be fixed, by why bother?

Thus learn do and dov and be happy forever. Would Do be a better choice
(upper case chars?) Don't know. This was used by UltiSnips.

Comment on this commit if you don't like this choice.
2013-07-08 23:47:14 +02:00
Marc Weber
d07009f27f Adding UltiSnips snippets, updating Readme
UltiSnips snippets are taken from UltiSnips repo.
Putting them nearby the engine seems to be the wrong thing to do.
One reason is that there are two forks now.
2013-03-17 20:13:47 +01:00