* move the doc for it to the top of the script to be consistent with
other syntax checkers
* dont define a s:checker var - just use the
g:syntastic_perl_efm_program variable. This simplifies things slightly
On systems where Ruby 1.8.7 is the default Ruby and users use
alternative suffixes (e.g., ruby19) or even rbenv or rvm Rubies, modern
Ruby syntax will be highlighted as an error.
The default behaviour in Syntastic is to run 'ruby' to check the syntax
of the script in question. This patch allows the user to specify a
different binary which may even be a full path. This should work on all
platforms.
let g:syntastic_ruby_exec = 'ruby19'
let g:syntastic_ruby_exec = '~/.rbenv/versions/1.9.2-p318/bin/ruby'
Move the coffeelint code out into its own function.
Init the coffeelint option once, at the top of the script. Change its
name so it begins with "syntastic_" - for namespacing purposes.
Previously we were using "medium verbosity" with `-W1`. The reason for
this is because using full verbosity caused some bogus repeated warnings
to appear in rspec files.
Enable full verbosity again and filter out the bogus warnings.
Closes#290
Cuda programs may produce different errors depending on the architecture of the
target hardware. The canonical example and reason for writing this patch, is the
lack of support for double precision numbers on older hardware. By default, nvcc
and thus syntastic, defaults to the most basic architecture. This can produce
false errors if the developer intends to compile for newer hardware and use
newer features.
Not defining g:syntastic_cuda_arch preserves this behavior. Otherwise the user
is expected to set it a valid arch flag, as listed by `nvcc --help`.
Example:
let g:syntastic_cuda_arch = "sm_20"
Some users might want to disable some checks for puppet-lint if they do
not intend to follow all of the style recommendations. There is
currently no way of doing that.
By adding a global variable synstastic_puppet_lint_arguments, one can
now set arguments to pass to puppet-lint via .vimrc.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Filion <lelutin@gmail.com>
First example:
$ echo -e 'if (0)\nsome();\n}' | perl -c -
Semicolon seems to be missing at - line 1.
syntax error at - line 2, near ")
some"
Unmatched right curly bracket at - line 3, at end of line
- had compilation errors.
$ echo -e 'if (0)\nsome();\n}' | perl syntax_checkers/efm_perl.pl -c -
-:1:Semicolon seems to be missing
Second example:
$ echo -e 'if (0)' | perl -c -
syntax error at - line 1, at EOF
- had compilation errors.
$ echo -e 'if (0)' | perl syntax_checkers/efm_perl.pl -c -
