When set to true, and the buffer is currently inside a pipenv,
GetExecutable will return "pipenv", which will trigger the existing
functionality to append the correct pipenv arguments to run each linter.
Defaults to false.
I was going to implement ale#python#PipenvPresent by invoking
`pipenv --venv` or `pipenv --where`, but it seemed to be abominably
slow, even to the point where the test suite wasn't even finishing
("Tried to run tests 3 times"). The diff is:
diff --git a/autoload/ale/python.vim b/autoload/ale/python.vim
index 7baae079..8c100d41 100644
--- a/autoload/ale/python.vim
+++ b/autoload/ale/python.vim
@@ -106,5 +106,9 @@ endfunction
" Detects whether a pipenv environment is present.
function! ale#python#PipenvPresent(buffer) abort
- return findfile('Pipfile.lock', expand('#' . a:buffer . ':p:h') . ';') isnot# ''
+ let l:cd_string = ale#path#BufferCdString(a:buffer)
+ let l:output = systemlist(l:cd_string . 'pipenv --where')[0]
+ " `pipenv --where` returns the path to the dir containing the Pipfile
+ " if in a pipenv, or some error text otherwise.
+ return strpart(l:output, 0, 18) !=# "No Pipfile present"
endfunction
Using vim's `findfile` is much faster, behaves correctly in the majority
of situations, and also works reliably when the `pipenv` command doesn't
exist.
* The project style linter now runs while you type.
* Now the scripts for checking the project require blank lines.
* Many style issues have been found and fixed.
It can be necessary to pass options to the puppet parser validation. The
most glaring example of this is when using Puppet 3, with the
`parser = future` option enabled. This update allows adding
`--parser=future` to the options passed to Puppet.
I see no reason to do this? It is just setting the environment to what
it already is?
It was originally added in #297, but that entire PR is not a great idea
in the first place; that PR (together with #270) tried to make the Go do
non-standard and non-supported stuff like compiling packages outside of
GOPATH.
That's not something that works well (I tried), so was eventually
removed in #465, but these "go env" calls remained, for no reason in
particular, as far as I can think of.
This will improve on #1834; you will now no longer get a confusing error
(but still won't get a meaningful error; need to think how to do that).
