I see no reason to do this? It is just setting the environment to what
it already is?
It was originally added in #297, but that entire PR is not a great idea
in the first place; that PR (together with #270) tried to make the Go do
non-standard and non-supported stuff like compiling packages outside of
GOPATH.
That's not something that works well (I tried), so was eventually
removed in #465, but these "go env" calls remained, for no reason in
particular, as far as I can think of.
This will improve on #1834; you will now no longer get a confusing error
(but still won't get a meaningful error; need to think how to do that).
- Re: f224ce8a37
- The issues that prompted the above commit which reverted changes made to `go build` and
`gometalinter` seemed to suggest that the main issue was with gometalinter and that
changes should be put into different commits so they are independent of each other
- This commit reinstates the changes to the `go build` linter which seem to be uncontested
and it also seems absolutely necessary to show errors from all files in the package which
may have caused a build failure.
* Added filename keys to gobuild and gometalinter
* Removed skipping files not in current package
* Removed `--include` for gometalinter
* Fixed the tests
* try fixing go build
* cache some system calls
* fix /dev/null
* use chained commands, use `go test -c` instead of `go tool compile`
* fix some unescaped shell commands
* fix a bug with explicitly setting GOPATH
* implement changes requested in code review. handle errors from multiple files. fix issue when starting a new package
* run `go env` as a job
* ensure all functions return the proper type
* fix loclist line numbers in some cases
* remove multibuffer support for now
* add go build for build errors
* Add go build to doc and README
* Improvement for Go build
Go build works on package level, so copy over the other files
that belong to the same package to the temp folder as well.
* revert back to simple go build
* change gobuild script var name
