The Rust compiler returns the first column that is _not_ part of the
current span as `column_end`, while Ale expects `end_col` to signify
the last column of the span.
Although using %t to lint changes was desirable, many pylama checks use
surrounding paths and file contents (e.g. C0103 module name, E0402
relative import beyond top, etc.) The more such errors I find during
testing, the less %t seems like a good idea. Switch to %s.
Also set `lint_file` to 1 and mark Pylama as a file linter in the docs.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
* Add initial ameba (crystal linter) support
Note that this depends on saved file as `ameba` does not have STDIN
support
* Fix formatting of crystal linter documentation
* Add tests for ameba executable customization
ale#Escape function seems to prepend and append ' to the file name, which
are not present in the pydocstyle output. Having the parsing regexp match
the file name was overkill anyway, since there is an obvious 1:1
correspondence between the buffer number and the (potential) errors
reported by pydocstyle.
See: https://github.com/testdouble/standard
StandardRB is to RuboCop what StandardJS is to ESLint. This commit
naively copies the RuboCop linter and fixer to point at the standardrb
executable. Any other adjustments are very minor (the only I can think
of is that standardrb takes a `--fix` option instead of
`--auto-correct`).
This raises a confusing point to me as both developer and a user: since
ale enables all linters by default, won't this run both RuboCop and
StandardRB (the results of which will almost always be in conflict with
one another)? How does ale already solve for this for the similar case
of StandardJS and ESLint?
The linter can correctly parse pydocstyle output with any of the following
command-line options enabled: --explain, --source, --debug, and/or
--verbose
The output format used by older checkstyle versions differs from the one
of new versions. This commit adds a second parsing iteration on the
output lines with a suitable pattern to support both versions in
parallel. Due to the differences in the order of matching groups this is
hard to achieve in a single pass through the output lines.
An appropriate test case is added.
* add prolog/swipl linter
* use load_files/2 instead of read_term/2
Because it also checks some semantic warnings / errors
not only syntactic warnings / errors.
e.g.:
* singleton warning
* discontiguous warning
* ...
cf. http://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=style_check/1
* support error messages with no line number
:- module(module_name, [pred/0]).
causes
ERROR: Exported procedure module_name:pred/0 is not defined
* add test for prolog/swipl handler
* cosmetic fixes
* detect timeout using SIGALRM
* rename g:prolog_swipl_goals to g:prolog_swipl_load
* write doc for prolog/swipl linter
* update toc and README
* fix ignore patterns
PMD is currently not working properly for Java classes that use [unnamed
packages](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se11/html/jls-7.html#jls-7.4.2).
Consider the following Java class that does not contain a `package`
declaration:
```java
public class App {
String getGreeting() {
return "Hello world.";
}
static void main(String... args) {
System.out.println(new App().getGreeting());
}
}
```
Running PMD in the command line agaist the Java class above produces an
output with empty string `""` in the `"Package"` column:
```sh
$ pmd -R category/java/bestpractices.xml -f csv -d './src/main/java/App.java'
Oct 02, 2018 9:10:39 PM net.sourceforge.pmd.PMD processFiles
WARNING: This analysis could be faster, please consider using Incremental Analysis: https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.7.0/pmd_userdocs_incremental_analysis.html
"Problem","Package","File","Priority","Line","Description","Rule set","Rule"
"1","","/Users/diego/Projects/github.com/dlresende/kata-fizz-buzz/src/main/java/App.java","2","7","System.out.println is used","Best Practices","SystemPrintln"
```
But the pmd.vim handler's current pattern refuses everything coming
from a Java class that does not have a package name (2nd column):
```vim
let l:pattern = '"\(\d\+\)",".\+","\(.\+\)","\(\d\+\)","\(\d\+\)","\(.\+\)","\(.\+\)","\(.\+\)"$'
```
The solution I am proposing is to also accept empty strings as package names.
