vim/YouCompleteMe
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #1302 from dawsonbotsford/master

Browse Source 
Spelling Correction from Dawson's Spelling Bee
This commit is contained in:
Val Markovic 2015-01-01 11:56:50 -08:00
commit 340a0b5f6b
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
README.md
View File

@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ process.
repository (Vundle will do this for you) to fetch YCM's dependencies.
3. [Complete this step ONLY if you care about semantic completion support for
C-family languages. Otherwise it's not neccessary.]
C-family languages. Otherwise it's not necessary.]
**Download the latest version of `libclang`**. Clang is an open-source
compiler that can compile C/C++/Objective-C/Objective-C++. The `libclang`
@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ process.
cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" . ~/.vim/bundle/YouCompleteMe/third_party/ycmd/cpp
For those who want to use the system version of boost, you would pass
`-DUSE_SYSTEM_BOOST=ON` to cmake. This may be neccassery on some systems
`-DUSE_SYSTEM_BOOST=ON` to cmake. This may be necessary on some systems
where the bundled version of boost doesn't compile out of the box.
NOTE: We **STRONGLY recommended AGAINST use** of the system boost instead
@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ YCM needs to perform subsequence-based filtering on _all_ of those identifiers
I'm sorry, but that level of performance is just plain impossible to achieve
with VimScript. I've tried, and the language is just too slow. No, you can't get
acceptable performance even if you limit yourself to just the identifiers in the
current file and simple prefix-based fitering.
current file and simple prefix-based filtering.
### Why does YCM demand such a recent version of Vim?