'main': 2nd optimization that in my tests shows 2.2s -> 2.0s
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a98cd3a10
commit
ef4bfe5bcc
@ -254,7 +254,16 @@ _zsh_highlight_main_highlighter()
|
||||
# end_pos was advanced by $offset (via start_pos)
|
||||
# and by $#arg. Note the `start_pos=$end_pos`
|
||||
# below.
|
||||
proc_buf="${proc_buf[offset + $#arg + 1,-1]}"
|
||||
#
|
||||
# As for the [,len]. We could use [,len-start_pos+offset]
|
||||
# here, but to make it easier on eyes, we use len and
|
||||
# rely on the fact that Zsh simply handles that. The
|
||||
# length of proc_buf is len-start_pos+offset because
|
||||
# we're chopping it to match current start_pos, so its
|
||||
# length matches the previous value of start_pos.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Why [,-1] is slower than [,length] isn't clear.
|
||||
proc_buf="${proc_buf[offset + $#arg + 1,len]}"
|
||||
|
||||
if [[ -n ${interactive_comments+'set'} && $arg[1] == $histchars[3] ]]; then
|
||||
if [[ $this_word == *(':regular:'|':start:')* ]]; then
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user